A Forensic Engineer’s Approach to a Failure Investigation

A Step-by-Step Breakdown

Forensic engineering is the art and science of investigating the causes of product failures, particularly in complex and high-risk industries such as energy, construction, aerospace, and manufacturing. The role of a forensic engineer is to determine the root cause of failure and provide recommendations to prevent similar incidents in the future. The process is both systematic and thorough, combining field investigation with laboratory analysis, testing, and expert knowledge. This guide outlines the detailed steps a forensic engineer would follow when investigating a product failure.

1. Initial Assessment and Information Gathering

The first step in any forensic investigation is to gather as much preliminary information as possible. This phase sets the foundation for the entire investigation and provides the forensic engineer with the necessary context to approach the failure scientifically.

Client briefing: The engineer begins by meeting with the client to gather details of the incident, including when and how the failure was discovered, the operational conditions at the time, and the expected performance of the product. The engineer might ask specific questions to clarify the nature of the problem and any suspected causes.

Document review: Next, the forensic engineer reviews all available documentation relevant to the failed product. This might include design specifications, manufacturing records, quality control data, maintenance logs, and any past incident reports. A detailed analysis of these records helps establish a timeline of the product’s life cycle, revealing potential points where issues may have occurred.

Site visit: If applicable, the engineer visits the site of the failure to inspect the product and its environment. Observing the failure in its operational context is crucial for understanding external factors such as environmental conditions, installation practices, and possible misuse.

Witness interviews: The forensic engineer may interview key personnel involved in the design, manufacturing, operation, or maintenance of the product. These interviews provide firsthand accounts of the conditions leading up to the failure and any anomalies observed before the incident.

2. Failure Scene Investigation and Evidence Collection

Once the initial data is gathered, the forensic engineer begins the investigation of the failed product itself. This phase involves a detailed examination and the collection of physical evidence, which will later undergo rigorous analysis.

Visual inspection: The forensic engineer conducts a close visual inspection of the failed product to identify obvious signs of damage, such as cracks, corrosion, deformation, or fractures. Observing the failure location, nature of the damage, and how it interacts with other components can offer vital clues. For example, a fracture pattern might suggest fatigue, while localised corrosion might point to environmental exposure.

Photographic documentation: Detailed photographs are taken from multiple angles to create a permanent record of the failure’s condition before any material is disturbed. These images become a crucial part of the forensic report, allowing other experts or legal professionals to review the evidence.

Sample collection: The engineer carefully collects samples of the failed product and surrounding materials. For instance, in the case of a metal component, samples may be cut from the failure site, including any sections displaying corrosion, wear, or cracking. These samples are meticulously labelled and preserved for later analysis.

3. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)

Once evidence is gathered, the next step is to perform non-destructive testing (NDT) on the failed product. This allows the forensic engineer to investigate surface and volumetric indications without causing additional damage to the product. NDT methods commonly used in failure investigations can include:

Ultrasonic testing: This method uses high-frequency sound waves to detect internal flaws, such as voids or cracks. By interpreting how sound waves bounce back from different materials, the forensic engineer can locate and size hidden defects.

Radiographic testing: Also known as X-ray testing, this method is used to identify internal discontinuities such as cracks, voids, or inclusions within the product. It is particularly useful for examining welds, castings, and thick sections of material.

Magnetic particle inspection: In ferromagnetic materials, this technique detects surface and near-surface cracks by applying magnetic fields and observing the accumulation of magnetic particles at defect locations.

Dye penetrant testing: This method involves applying a visible or fluorescent dye to the surface of a non-porous material, which seeps into cracks. When excess dye is removed and a developer applied, any flaws will appear as visible traces on the surface.
These methods help forensic engineers detect subsurface or microscopic flaws that might not be visible through simple observation.

4. Laboratory Analysis

With the evidence and NDT results in hand, the forensic engineer moves on to a detailed laboratory analysis. This is a critical step in the process, as it provides in-depth insight into the material and mechanical properties of the failed product.

Metallurgical analysis: If the product is metal, a forensic metallurgist might use a microscope to examine the material’s grain structure. Techniques like scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can reveal microstructural features that indicate whether the material has undergone proper heat treatment, if any inclusions or impurities are present, and how the material failed (e.g., ductile versus brittle fracture).

Fractography: The study of fracture surfaces, or fractography, is a key aspect of failure analysis. By examining the fracture surface at high magnification, the forensic engineer can determine the mode of failure. For example, smooth, shiny surfaces often indicate brittle failure, while rough, fibrous surfaces suggest ductile failure.

Chemical composition testing: The forensic engineer might also conduct chemical tests to verify the material’s composition. Deviations from the specified alloy or material grade can reveal manufacturing errors or poor material selection.

Hardness and tensile testing: Mechanical properties such as hardness, toughness, tensile strength, and ductility are measured to assess whether the material met the design requirements. Results from these tests will indicate the mechanical condition of the material.

5. Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Once all evidence is gathered and analysed, the forensic engineer performs a root cause analysis (RCA). RCA involves systematically reviewing all possible causes of the failure, from material defects to design flaws, manufacturing issues, and operational factors. The goal is to determine not only how the product failed, but why.

For instance, RCA might reveal that the failure was due to a combination of factors, such as poor material selection, improper welding techniques, and excessive environmental stress. The forensic engineer will document each contributing factor and explain how it led to the final failure.

6. Reporting and Recommendations

Once the root cause of the failure is established, the forensic engineer prepares a detailed report for the client. The report typically includes:

Summary of the incident: A brief overview of the failure, the investigation process, and the key findings.

Root cause identification: A clear explanation of the primary and contributing causes of the failure, supported by evidence such as photographs, diagrams, and test results.

Supporting evidence: All relevant data from NDT, laboratory analysis, and mechanical testing, including photos, graphs, and charts, to provide transparency and support the conclusions.

Recommendations: The forensic engineer offers corrective actions to prevent similar failures in the future. These might include changes in material selection, design modifications, stricter quality control protocols, or improved operational procedures.

7. Expert Witness Testimony (if necessary)

Once the root cause of the failure is established, the forensic engineer prepares a detailed report for the client. The report typically includes:

Summary of the incident: A brief overview of the failure, the investigation process, and the key findings.

Root cause identification: A clear explanation of the primary and contributing causes of the failure, supported by evidence such as photographs, diagrams, and test results.

Supporting evidence: All relevant data from NDT, laboratory analysis, and mechanical testing, including photos, graphs, and charts, to provide transparency and support the conclusions.

Recommendations: The forensic engineer offers corrective actions to prevent similar failures in the future. These might include changes in material selection, design modifications, stricter quality control protocols, or improved operational procedures.

Conclusion:

conclusion graphic

Forensic engineers play a vital role in investigating product failures, ensuring the safety, reliability, and performance of products across many industries. By systematically gathering evidence, conducting non-destructive testing, performing detailed laboratory analysis, and providing expert recommendations, they help companies identify and correct the root causes of failures. This process not only resolves individual incidents but also improves industry standards, helping prevent future failures and enhancing overall safety.

Gary Brooks

Gary Brooks is a leading independent Forensic Engineer and Expert Witness with over 30 years of experience across many diverse industries, including Nuclear, Oil and gas, Aviation, and Renewable Energy.His expertise covers welding engineering, physical metallurgy, non-destructive testing, damage mechanisms, quality assurance/control, and fabrication.

Request A Free Consultation

    Captcha

    We are always available for an initial, confidential discussion at no cost and with no commitment. This opportunity allows you to present your case, enabling us to identify the best course of action and determine the appropriate expertise needed. With our vast knowledge base and continuous expansion of disciplines, we can often provide immediate solutions without charge during the consultation.